tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1644690488802388716.post5929193960290122278..comments2024-03-28T23:48:27.173-06:00Comments on Mysteries and More from Saskatchewan: None So Blind with SpoilersBill Selneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17268006369157307593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1644690488802388716.post-12106744229110208812015-06-02T22:36:50.738-06:002015-06-02T22:36:50.738-06:00Margot: Thanks for the comment. I think it would b...Margot: Thanks for the comment. I think it would be interesting if you could cast your mind through the mysteries you have read to see what examples you could recall where the sleuth is found to be wrong in identifying the killer with huge consequences to the person wrongfully convicted or killed by the sleuth.Bill Selneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17268006369157307593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1644690488802388716.post-34099997147315521252015-06-02T05:37:56.545-06:002015-06-02T05:37:56.545-06:00It is really fascinating, Bill, when the author is...It is really fascinating, Bill, when the author is willing to have her or his sleuth be quite that wrong. The enormity of it is, I'd guess, very hard to accept; little wonder that it's so hard to get everyone to admit there was a mistake of that magnitude and start over. That Fradkin takes that approach is innovative and sounds compelling. Thanks, too, for your insights on the real-life cases. I remember reading about the 'Ken and Barbie' cases and of course, the Dreyfus case. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com