Hazel is a poor patient. She dearly
wants out of Andrew’s home. She is bored of looking at the walls. She is
starting to like too much the little white Percocet pills. Time is passing too
slowly in a house filled with clocks.
Officer James Wingate drops by
occasionally to update her on the Port Dundas OPS detachment and seek some
guidance on files. Hazel remains in charge of the detachment while on sick
leave.
It is the start of summer in cottage
country and the local paper, The Westmuir
Record, is running its traditional work of summer fiction in several
installments. It is a creepy story of a pair of fishermen hooking a body in the
lake.
Her return to the office is
accelerated when a pair of tourists hook and then lose a body in a local lake.
When the police return they find the body but it is a headless mannequin. It
has been weighted down to lie on the bottom of the lake.
Hazel and other officers are puzzled
by anyone going to that much effort with a mannequin. It is equally a mystery
why the story in the paper and the incident mirror each other.
As Wingate looks into the mannequin
he finds it has been subtly altered. When the police figure out what has
happened they are led into a bizarre spooky scheme.
As they solve one puzzle another one
is set before them. Hazel is very frustrated as the police are manipulated. I
was reminded of Lincoln Rhyme mysteries of Jeffery Deaver where Lincoln is
often trying to unravel mysteries of manipulation.
During the investigation Hazel must
travel the two hours to Toronto to get information. Toronto City Police are
barely civil to the visitors from the country.
At home Hazel is not looking forward
to her 62nd birthday. Between growing older, getting divorced,
having major health problems and a troubled grown up daughter she has many
personal issues. Mainly she is lonely. The book does have a birthday present
for Hazel I will long remember.
Hazel does not direct the
investigation but is fully involved. At one point there is a fight. It has been
a long while in the crime fiction world since I can remember reading about a
woman in her 60’s mixing it up physically.
Wolfe has some finely written
passages. Wingate responds to Hazel’s question on how he, her temporary
replacement, is being treated:
“They
resent me with a smile.”
I thought the book was long in the
middle. As the conclusion nears the pace becomes far more compelling.
Hazel remains an intriguing and
inviting character. I acknowledge a bias towards liking a sleuth within a
couple of years of my own age.
I appreciated that the book is far
different from The Calling where she
dealt with one of the most unusual serial killers in crime fiction.
The 3rd book in the
series, A Door in the River, is due
to be published this summer. I will be interested to see if Hazel remains a
member of the OPS. She is of an age that police forces do not favour for
serving officers. In The Taken she is
referred to as a dinosaur.
Next week I will be writing about
the effect upon me of reading a book by Wolfe who has remained a pseudonym
while knowing the identity of Alix Bosco, a former pseudonym while reading Slaughter Falls. (June 16/12)
Bill - Thanks for this fine review. I really will be interested in what you have to say about the fact that this author chooses to keep a pseudonym and remain unknown otherwise. It's an interesting question...
ReplyDeleteI respect an author who does innovative things with plots and tries different approaches and it seems that's what Wolfe has done here. I'll be interested to see what comes next for Hazel, too.
Margot: Thanks for the comment. It was a good surprise when I realized the book was not another serial killer mystery.
ReplyDeleteNice review, Bill. I read the first in the series but though I really liked the idea of the character of Hazel (her age, status, gender etc) she did not quite work for me. The "in peril" sections at the end were too obvious (I was just waiting for it...) and something about the police team's dynamics just did not seem convincingly conveyed. But the main reason I hated the book and probably will not read more by the author were the awful "in the fridge" ritualistic, gory, unnecessarily dwelling lovingly on, nasty murders.....just see no point to that and I hate reading it.
ReplyDeleteThanks for taking part in the 5th annual Canadian Book Challenge! I don't read a lot of crime fiction, so I've been actively following your reviews looking for recommendations!
ReplyDeleteMaxine: Thanks for the comment. The second book is not as graphic. There are still some vivid descriptions of harm.
ReplyDeleteJohn: Thanks for the kind words. I admire your work in continuing the annual Canadian Book Challenge.
ReplyDelete