The narrator of the book, Gustav Links, is a talented
mathematician who was saved from execution in the People’s Court of Nazi
Germany as a conspirator in the attempted assassination of Hitler in 1944 by a
bomb killing the judge, Rudolph Fleisler, during his trial.
In examining the evidence from Nuremberg Bacon finds
information about a mysterious figure, Klingsor, the pseudonym adopted by a
German scientist who decided what scientific war research was conducted for the
Nazi regime. Klingsor is an epic pseudonym using the name of a figure from
German mythology.
The book has a clever premise as Bacon sets out to find this
mysterious mastermind of the WW II German atomic research.
Links serves as Bacon’s advisor and ultimately partner in
the search which proceeds at a leisurely pace.
I would have been happier with a shorter back story than the
100 pages it took to reach the start of the search.
The structure of the book is an effort to follow a
scientific process of proposing laws and corolloraries and then testing them.
An example is:
LAW II: All men are liars
If, as stated by Godel’s theorem,
every axiomatic system contains undecidable propositions; if, as stated by
Einstein’s relativity, absolute time and space do not exist; if, as postulated
by the rules of quantum physics and as a consequence of the uncertainty
principle, science can offer only vague and random approximations of the cosmos
– then we can no longer rely on causality as an accurate predictor of the
future. And if specific individuals possess only specific truths, then all of
us – made up of the same material of which atoms are made – are the result of
paradox and impossibility. Our convictions can only be considered half-truths.
It is a book physicists will love. For the rest of us it is
slow going for considerable stretches as we learn about the lives and work of Germany ’s
most prominent physicists prior to and during WW II.
Volpi shows how Nazi ideology interfered with research. The
Nobel Prize winner Werner Heisenberg was denied a leading position at the University
of Munich after the following
attacks upon him:
“In July of 1937, in an unsigned
article published in Das Schwarze Korps,
you were insultingly referred to as a ‘white Jew’. Stark quickly followed this
with a series of articles: ‘Science has failed politically,’ ‘White Jews in
Science,’ and ‘The Pragmatic and the Dogmatic Spirit in Physics,’ this last
piece published in the English journal Nature.
The book has some intriguing use of scientific terms. The
subject of a search is described as elusive as an atom.
It is hard to sustain drama in a search being conducted through
interviews of scientists who spend their time either thinking or in labs.
Now physicists do have far more dramatic sexual lives than I
anticipated. When not thinking they are constantly active in the bedroom.
The book touches upon some major issues such as whether
science is a substitute for religion in a conversation with the great physicist
Max Planck:
“Not for a skeptic, because
science also requires a spirit that believes. Anyone who has seriously studied
a scientific subject knows that there is a sign above the entrance to the
temple of science which says You must
have faith. Scientists cannot ignore that. Anyone who analyzes a series of
results obtained through a scientific experiment must be able to imagine the
law he is seeking to prove. Then, he must bring it to life with an intellectual
hypothesis.”
In many ways the book sets out in fiction the information
contained in Heisenberg’s War which
was my previous post on Wednesday. In my
next post on Sunday I will discuss how Volpi changed history to help his story.
The book is very well written. Volpi is a skilled writer. It is a good book for a reader wanting to know about German
efforts towards building an atomic bomb without reading a non-fiction account
of the program. It would help to have an interest in science.
The following deals
with some issues I had with the book. They may be spoilers for some readers:
1.) It took 365 pages to find out why a pseudonym was used rather than
Klingsor’s real name;
2.) It took even longer into the book to learn why it was important to
find Klingsor; and,
3.) The process of investigation is awkward and unconvincing.
Bill - I'm sorry to hear that there were some things that disappointed you about the book. The premise sounds really interesting (of course I find that part of history fascinating). I may give this one a try despite the reservations you had about it. But I'll wait until I can set aside time to take the book in small doses.
ReplyDeleteSounds like not enough plot?
ReplyDeleteMargot: the premise drew me to the book. It was interesting to think about big issues in a mystery / thriller but there was precious little to the search.
ReplyDeleteDr. Evangelicus: Thanks for the comment. The plot outside the scientific discussions and historical elements was certainly modest in scope.
ReplyDelete