Based
on Murder One and the title of The Jury Master I was expecting another
legal mystery. To my disappointment The
Jury Master is actually a thriller that happens to feature a lawyer. Even
had I read the blurbs on the paperback, which I did not following customary
practice, I would have thought it was a legal mystery. To me the title is
misleading.
While
Sloane certainly is a Jury Master the book has little to do with him being a
lawyer.
The
opening of the book does show why he is called the Jury Master. Sloane has a
rare, almost mystical, talent for connecting with and persuading juries. His
closing address wins a case for the defendants in a wrongful death suit. He has
regrets over his success.
I
was hoping I would learn more about his mastery of juries. Instead, the book
veered into a thriller.
Joe
Branick, special assistant to the President of the United States, dies in a
park in West Virginia. For reasons Sloane cannot fathom Branick, the day he
died, was trying to contact Sloane.
Charles
Town, West Virginia detective, Tom Molia known to all as “Mole”, balks at the
swift effort to have Branick’s death declared a suicide. He is uneasy partly
because a young policeman responding to the report of death has disappeared.
Rivers
Jones from the Federal Department of Justice, acting on the personal
instructions of Parker Madsen the White House Chief of Staff, takes over the
investigation into Branick’s death. Mole is even more suspicious.
Finally,
in rural Washington, Charles Jenkins a retired CIA operative gets a visit from
Alex Hart from the Federal Government. What she brings with her shocks Jenkins.
From
there the book races along at excellent thriller pace. There is the occasional
need to suspend belief but nothing extreme.
There
is a conspiracy at play that is also more credible than the average fictional
conspiracy.
Sloane
is mystified as he cannot ever recall having a connection to Branick. He does
not recall ever dealing with him or working with him or even meeting him.
Aiding
Sloane is his long time personal assistant, Tina. She is the assistant of a
lawyer’s dreams keeping the office in order and meeting Sloane’s needs almost
quicker than he tells what is to be done.
Dugoni
does well in letting the reader and Sloane work out the conspiracy. It is
frightenly plausible.
It
was interesting to receive background on Sloane. He had orphaned at 7 by an
accident and raised in foster homes. His youth had been a struggle. Joining the
U.S. Marines at 17 set him on his path to success. In this book Sloane is based
in San Francisco. By Murder One he is
in the state of Washington.
If
you are looking for a thriller with a lawyer it is a good book. If you want a legal
mystery, move on to a different book. I will still characterize it as a legal
mystery for the main character is a lawyer and there are elements of law in the
book. (Apr. 9/14)
****
Dugoni, Robert - (2013) - Murder One and Email Exchange with Dugoni on Legal Ethics
Bill - I am glad that as a thriller you thought it was enjoyable. But I know exactly what you mean about books that aren't what you expect. I've had that happen too and it's so disappointing. I have to say though that I am intrigued by a character who has that much charisma when it comes to a jury.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. I am sure Dugoni was an excellent trial lawyer. The closing address his character, David Sloane, makes to win the case at the beginning of The Jury Master is brilliant. That brilliance is one of the reasons I was disappointed the rest of the book was not about a court case.
DeleteThis sounds good: I used to live in Washington state, so that's an added attraction. I always enjoy the legal expertise you bring to your reviews, and this time I was also amused by your comments on the lawyer's assistant, Tina - that sounded like the voice of experience!
ReplyDeleteMoira: I did not know you had lived in America. A good personal assistant, I still think of p.a.'s as secretaries, is a special person.
DeleteBill, a lot of mysteries and thrillers involving the President, directly or indirectly, are conspiracies. I think they appeal to many readers. I have read a few myself. I enjoy reading, as well as watching on film, a lawyer's "closing address" before a jury, partly because of the dramatic effect. Being a lay reader I would have thought this novel was a legal mystery rather than a thriller featuring a lawyer. I can see why it's not the same thing. Thanks for explaining that aspect of the book.
ReplyDeletePrashant: Thanks for the comment. Closing addresses can be fascinating to listen and watch for their effect. What is much harder is to make them as good on paper. Part of what makes them compelling visually and aurally are the actions and voice of the lawyer. Errors in grammar and repetition may work better in an address than they do when written.
Delete