John Brooke |
It
was the first book I can remember reading where it was a woman who was in
charge of the investigation at competing law enforcement agencies.
It
is not a surprise to have women in charge. We are a generation away from the
pioneering days of Helen Mirren as the commanding officer in the T.V. series, Prime Suspect. It is not uncommon in
real life for women to lead police services. I have met woman sergeants administering rural Saskatchewan
RCMP detachments.
What
struck me in the book was that there was none of the male resentment of the
officers serving under Mirren. Nouvelle and Tessier are accepted as in charge.
Their subordinates may have issues with their superior but it is not because
they are women. They give orders to their male and female team members and
their instructions are carried out.
I
certainly acknowledge prejudice towards women in authority continues to exist
but not in this book.
What
was fascinating to me was the relationship Brooke set out between Nouvelle and
Tessier when they butt up against each other in the investigation.
There
was no gender solidarity in that each was a woman and that they should share
information as women trying to make their way in leadership positions in what
is a man’s world.
Their
attitudes as they confront each other are different from what I would expect
from men in the same situation. For men there is bound to be a macho component.
It would be almost inevitable to have physical aggressiveness and, possibly
even a fight. Nouvelle and Tessier wage a subtler war of words and attitudes.
Nouvelle
challenges Tessier’s right and need for secrecy as Nouvelle investigates a murder.
Tessier is instragient dismissing the requests for information as contrary to
national security.
Nouvelle
persists threatening Tessier with legal and political consequences rather than
physical violence. Tessier is unmoved and projects her position through her
attitude. She is secure in her knowledge of DST priority in the conflict over
information. She disdainfully rejects Nouvelle.
Nouvelle
is upset about the patronizing attitude of the older Tessier.
At
the same time Nouvelle projects a moral superiority. She is solving a murder of
an actual French citizen. She is not taking advantage of authority to abuse
citizens for the sake of a potential anarchist risk.
Nouvelle
is reluctant to carry her gun unless there is a clear need. Her policy causes
her problems. Tessier is always well armed and ready for action.
Nouvelle
and Tessier carry on their conflict in frosty exchanges through the book. There
are many barbed comments especially by Tessier.
The
test of wills between the women may not be as overt as male battles but it is
as real and as fierce.
Having
women in authority has not reduced the level of conflict between competing government
police agencies. I wonder how future crime fiction will deal with woman versus
woman in law enforcement.
Almost two years ago I wrote a post titled Being Affected by a Male Author Creating aFemale Sleuth as I discussed New Zealand author writing under the name of Alix Bosco. I found myself distracted on whether McGee had created a “convincing” female sleuth.
At
the end of the post I spoke about focusing on the book and quoted from a
comment from the late Maxine
Clarke, who I miss dearly:
Going forward I am going to do my best to just concentrate on the book.
As blogger, Maxine Clarke, from the excellent Petrona blog said in a comment on my review of Slaughter Falls:
To me, the gender of the author is irrelevant. I have a review going up
tomorrow of Mildred Pierce by James M Cain, which is such an accurate, and
wonderful, portrait of a woman on all kind of levels. Amazing that it was
written by a man? No. Just someone with talent.
I
consider Brooke as someone with talent. I found that he created not only two
convincing female characters he had insight into their minds and how
women interact with each other. I shall be interested in hearing from female
readers if they thought Brooke can write well of the female psyche.
Bill - What a fascinating post! One of the things I absolutely love about crime fiction is the way in which it reflects societal changes. And that certainly inclues changes in the roles women play. You make a well-taken point that those changes mean that women now are involved in conflicts, power struggles, etc. in different ways. Thank for the rich 'food for thought.'
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. When I read you are thinking I expect I will soon read a post for you on contemporary women in conflict.
DeleteI second Margot, this is a fascinating post. I especially enjoyed your comments on a male writing a female, which has bothered me occasionally in the past.
ReplyDeleteTracyK: Thanks for the comment. I think I have come to realize the gender of the author should not affect my perception of the credibility of their characters.
DeleteAnd I'm the third woman reader of yours to say that was highly interesting reading. Very much giving us all to think, and I liked your well-reasoned and thoughtful comments.
ReplyDeleteMoira: Thanks for the comment and kind words. I hope you get a chance to read in the series and put up posts.
Delete