As a member of the Special Victims Unit of the District
Attorney’s office Cooper is present to help participate in the investigation to
help ensure the evidence is effectively developed for trial.
She joins Detectives Mike Chapman and Mercer Wallace in
the investigation.
Not having read a book in the series for some years I do
not know the background of the relationship between Chapman and Cooper. It is
clear in the book they have been lovers but it is neither an open nor stable
relationship.
There are few clues in the suite. It was interesting to
read of a new forensic device that can date when blood flowed from a body by
its decomposition. It gives the investigators a more accurate and tighter range
of death than a pathologist at the scene can give from examining the body.
It is an unusual hotel killing in that the victim was not
a guest and they cannot find a video image of her entering the hotel.
Eventually they determine she was brought to the hotel by a means that prevented her entry from being seen.
Small leads take the detectives and Cooper into the Grand
Central Terminal. It is an amazing building but an absolute nightmare for a
police investigation. It is a vast building above and below ground. There are
passages unmarked on blueprints. There are active tunnels for trains and closed
tunnels. There are exits almost beyond number.
When there is a second murder whose victim also bears the
carved designs the investigators realize they have a dangerous killer using the
Terminal.
The killer’s motive is unclear. The team struggles to
find a reason for the killings especially the first murder.
The second victim spent much of his time underground in
the vicinity of the station. Cooper and the detectives explore the tunnels
where hundreds are living in communities. It is a dark and dismal life. They
are known rather derisively as “moles”.
The connections underground between subways, trains and
passages to buildings were so extensive as to be almost impossible to document.
The book revealed to me there is an actual terminal city
in central Manhattan. In Bone City by Jeffery Deaver I had learned of the extensive underground to Manhattan but I had not been aware of the majesty and complexity of Grand Central.
Unused tunnels hold unexpected artifacts such as FDR’s
armored train sitting in the dark for decades.
The terminal gives the book its focus. While setting is
often important it is vital to Terminal
City. As the book went on I found myself look forward as much to learning
more about Grand Central as I did to the development of the investigation.
It is an excellent police procedural. The detectives and
Cooper are clever and determined investigators. If I had read the book
expecting a criminal investigation I would have been happy with the book.
However, I read the book as one of the three books on the shortlist for the
Harper Lee Prize for Legal Fiction.
Cooper functions as another criminal investigator in the
book. It is a stretch to find anything she really does as a lawyer in the
murder investigation. Her brief attendance in court is on a different case.
Cooper, being a lawyer assisting the police, does not fit
with my expectation for a book nominated for a prize in legal fiction. The book
is devoted to the investigation. Thus I am disappointed that it was chosen for
the shortlist.
Fairstein is an accomplished writer with numerous books
in the series featuring Cooper acting as a lawyer. It would be ironic if she
were to win the Harper Lee Prize for a book in which Cooper is actually acting
as a police officer. (August 8, 2015)
I'm glad you enjoyed the book, Bill, even if didn't have a strong a legal plot thread as a short list entry would have. And Grand Central Station really is majestic. People who use it all the time likely get jaded, but It is quite a sight to see.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. One of the things I learned from the book is "terminal" in the name means train routes end and start from there. Trains pass through "stations".
DeleteInteresting review, Bill. This is one of those series that I bought the first in the series years ago (2006) but still haven't read it. This one sounds good, but I would read at least some of the earlier ones first.
ReplyDeleteTracyK: Thanks for the comment. I think it is a good idea to start earlier in the series if possible.
Delete