Friday, May 27, 2016

Personal Choices in the Third Reich

Albert Goring
I have been thinking about choices this year as I have read a group of books about life in Western Europe during the Third Reich.

In The Hotel on Place Vendome by Tilar J. Mazzeo there were the choices made by the owners and staff of a great hotel in Paris, the Ritz, during the German occupation. High ranking Germans stayed at the hotel. They enjoyed meals and celebrations with their French mistresses and French citizens working with the occupiers. While some hotel workers were in the French Resistance at the hotel they spent their shifts making life comfortable for the German occupiers. Madam Ritz and her staff conducted business as usual.

Choices were possible in Occupied Europe. The leaders of Bulgaria worked to protect their nation’s Jewish population. They refused to let them be deported to concentration camp. At the same time they made the choice not to oppose the transport of thousands of Jews from other nations, mainly Greece, who had sought refuge in Bulgaria.

I have written about my personal contacts with individual choices made in Occupied Europe. I met a Danish farm family who sheltered a German Jewish girl. I know a Dutch war bride who as a teenager altered ID cards in an office next to the local German Army headquarters. She successfully saved young men from being sent to Germany as slave labour.

Hitler’s Art Thief by Susan Ronald explored the life of Hildebrand Gurlitt, a respected professor of art history and museum director, who made the choice to become an art dealer benefiting from the forced sales, confiscations and looting of art works under Nazi rule. He was a classic war profiteer only concerned with profiting from the opportunities of war. He was uncaring about the fate of Jews beyond his family. He exploited Nazi ideology to become rich. Cooly objective he was among the earliest to realize how the Nazis would govern and conqueor and later that they were going to lose the war. He made money in victory and defeat.

By contrast, Josef Muller, in Church of Spies by Mark Riebling made a different set of personal choices. A lawyer and devout Catholic he could have had a profitable war. Refusing to grovel to Heinrich Himmler in the mid-1930’s he turned down an invitation to join the SS because its principles were opposed to his principles. He aided Jews in his law practice. Muller opposed Hitler acting as a courier and a liason between Pope Pius XII and the German Resistance led by Admiral Canaris in the Abwehr. He put his life at stake.

Albert Goring made choices that were both profitable and principled. The brother of Hermann Goring he enjoyed opportunities in the armaments industry spending most of the war working as the export director of Skoda in Czechoslovakia. While diligently working to build weapons for the Wehrmacht he also aided Jews and others being persecuted by the Nazis. Using his connections with Hermann he saved a significant number of people. He refused to adopt the customs of the Nazis. He was known in Czechoslovakia for responding to the stiff arm of the Hitler salute with a lift of his hat.

For German soldiers there was the decision on whether to participate in the Holocaust. For every fictional Bernie Gunther who refused to take part and was re-assigned there were an abundance of real life Arthur Nebe’s who moved from the Berlin Police Department to the killing fields of Western Russia in 1941.

Average Germans had their own choices.

Several thousand Berlin residents protected, fed and housed about 2,000 Jews during the war. These Jews were known as U-boats as they secretly lived in Germany’s capital.

Many more thousands personally profited from the Holocaust. In Seduced by Hitler there is the story of how over 100,000 residents of Hamburg chose to buy, from 1941 to 1945, at bargain prices in public auctions the furnishings confiscated from Jews sent to concentration camps. Such auctions were held throughout Germany.

Gitta Sereny in her book, The Healing Wound, talked about an aspect of German culture that continues to lead Germans to conformity with the prevailing establishment. She spoke of “Obrigkeit – authority or hierarchy”. In talking about young people a generation after the war she said:

Only a few of them connect own incapacity for battling with authority, with the unprecedented success of the totalitarian idea in Germany.

While culture played a role every German made his or her own choices.

In my travels to Germany I have met one man who was an avowed Nazi. It was in 1981 and he had been physically unfit to serve during the war. He had an amazing collection of  German war memorabilia and would ring a bell next to a skull in a German helmet in honour of the millions of German war dead. He added that in 50 years Hitler would be known as the Saint from Braunau.

12 comments:

  1. Bill maybe you would like to read more about a Spanish diplomat, Ángel Sanz Briz who saved the lives of some five thousand [1] Hungarian Jews from Nazi persecution. This is a link to his Wikipedia page:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81ngel_Sanz_Briz

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jose Ignacio: Thanks for the comment. I appreciate you mentioning this courageous man who made the choice to save lives.

      Delete
  2. What a well-written and thoughtful post about choices, Bill. I think that it all comes down to that, really. And it's during circumstances such as the Nazi regime that people really look inside, as the saying goes, and decide which choices they will make.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Margot: Thanks for the comment. The books have made me think about the choices of my life.

      Delete
  3. It's hard for me to read this, but I'm glad to see the names of those who helped Jewish people stay alive, risking their own lives.

    Jewish people, Roma, many Poles, Russians, Czechoslovakians, Greeks, had no choices. They were victims.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kathy D.: Thanks for the comment. My good friend, Doug Elliott, who is a gay man noted on my Facebook sharing of the post that he would have been in a concentration camp. There would have been no choice for him.

      Delete
  4. World War II and the Third Reich is one of the most interesting topics I have read about and there seems to be so much information one can never read it all. Often we pay more attention to the bad choices people make or the bad things that happen to people and it is good to remember that there were people who chose to be courageous and risk their lives and futures. These posts have been very informative, Bill.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TracyK: Thanks for the comment. Our news is certainly filled with people who made bad choices. There are always new challenges requiring us all to continue making choices.

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Moira: Thanks for the comment. I think you could put together a post on choices of clothes in Germany and Occupied Europe.

      Delete
  6. I think Moira, talented as she is, could figure out a lot of political and moral choices, too -- and make the correct ones.

    You are right. Your gay friend would have had no choices, nor would many disabled and developmentally disabled people either, including children so brutally used by the Nazi maniacs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kathy D.: Thanks for the comment. Another group of the persecuted were Jehovah Witnesses.

      Delete