In
Canada there are major criminal organizations. The Hells Angels, Indian gangs,
Asian gangs and Mafia families are all carrying on the drug business. While
there is conflict between them and constant police pressure the Rule of Law prevails
in Canada.
As
our nation deals with organized crime there is a constant tension. Our courts
and Parliament balance individual freedoms against effective enforcement of the
laws against drug dealers.
Respect
for the law is being challenged by our evolving approach to marijuana. Canada
is on the verge of decriminalizing possession of marijuana. Growing and selling
marijuana is going to be big business in Canada.
The
issue at this time involves the current laws on possession of marijuana are not
being consistently enforced in Canada. It is a rare event for a recreational
user of marijuana to be prosecuted in Vancouver. It happens every day in
Saskatchewan.
It
is never good for the Rule of Law to have selective enforcement of laws.
I
am not sure of the consequences when marijuana is decriminalized. I will be
glad to see marijuana removed from the products being sold by criminal
organizations. Even more important we will return to a nation-wide enforcement
of drug laws.
In
Mexico, the issue is not an erosion of respect for the law but rather no
respect for the law as the law appears irrelevant with respect to the business
of drug trafficking.
Cartel stated
there were 7,000 murders in Ciudad Juarez by 2010 with barely any prosecutions.
Who can respect the law when it is not enforced?
Out
of all the participants in the legal system of Mexico the courts of that nation
play no role in the book.
Where
large sums are paid to the police and to the military and to politicians there
are no payoffs in the book to judges and prosecutors. It would appear there is
no need to buy them off. They have a negligible impact on the drug trade.
When
someone happens to be arrested for participating in the drug trade there
appears a good chance from Cartel
they will be convicted and sent to jail. While conditions are brutal any high
ranking narco will be well treated and there is the constant prospect of a jail
break. Drug business is not even interrupted by a jail term.
Most
frightening in the book is the shift, led by America, to assassinate enemies
rather than arresting and trying them.
Within
Cartel that philosophy is set out as
shifting from counterinsurgency to anti-terrorism. Instead of preventing
attacks and building relationships it is a philosophy of killing, especially
drug lords. Mexican marines, apparently the only non-corruptible force in
Mexico, look to “arrest them if we have to …. kill them when we can”.
Last
year I remember reading a news report of a raid on a Mexican ranch where 42 narcos were
killed against 1 dead police officer.
Hitler
and Stalin make mockeries of the judicial systems of Germany and the U.S.S.R.
with show trials of those individuals considered dangerous to the government.
In Mexico of the 21st Century, Cartel
depicts a criminal justice system that does not even have show trials before
executions.
The
trials at Nuremberg after WW II were to mark a new approach to dealing with war
crimes. In recent years the ICC has sought to codify the prosecution of war
crimes.
The
new killing approach is eliminating the Rule of Law as there are no trials.
I
do not know how to restore the Rule of Law in Mexico. The law is being ignored
by narcos, law enforcement and politicians. Who can lead the way to enforcing
the law?
There
is a brave attempt by women in The Cartel,
living in the vicinity of Ciudad Juarez, one of the major drug entry points to
America. They take over positions in municipal administrations and local police
forces because the men were afraid of being killed. Clearly outgunned by
everyone they are challenging the narcos with their belief in the Rule of Law.
I
hope the citizens of the Western World realize how important the Rule of Law is
to preserving freedom.
You make a powerful argument here, Bill. The rule of law is absolutely paramount to the functioning of any society, and we can see too well what happens when it isn't respected. It's one reason for which I have such a big problem with 'vigilante justice.' And there are plenty of other examples, too, of what happens when the rule of law isn't respected. Thank you for the reminder.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. I equally dislike 'vigilante' actions. I cannot call them 'justice'.
DeleteOh dear, this is so very depressing, and very difficukt to think of any answer. I like Don Winslow, but I'm not sure I can bear to read the book you describe so well....
ReplyDeleteMoira: Thanks for the comment. I did not see answers from Winslow beyond changing the drug laws of the United States to eliminate the profits of drug trafficking. Yet who wants to decriminalize cocaine and crystal meth.
Delete