The
Board investigates complaints against Florida judges. Much of their time is
spent investigating complaints concerning judges who have personal issues that
have rendered them incapable of judging properly. One of her current
investigations is a judge whose alcoholism is affecting him on the bench.
However, the allegations sometimes involve corruption.
Lacy
and another staff lawyer, Hugo Hatch, drive to St. Augustine to meet a
mysterious source who claims to have information on a corrupt judge on a vast
scale. While skeptical the claim is overblown they have agreed to the meeting.
They
meet Ramsey Mix, who has changed his name to Greg Myer, at a marina. A
disbarred lawyer, Myer, has regained his licence to practise law. He is acting
as an intermediary for a go-between who is representing a “mole” who has
information on a circuit court judge in northern Florida.
None
of the trio is altruistic. They expect to gain millions under Florida’s
Whistleblower statute which pays informants who provide information that allows
the State to recover illicit funds. At the same time the trio is very wary
convinced that their lives are in danger if identified.
While
the arrangement is convoluted Lacy and Hugo get enough from Myer to proceed
with an investigation.
They
soon learn that the judge is Claudia McDover and the corruption involves a
casino owned by the small Tappacola Indian Tribe. Though the Tappacolas are
modest in number the casino is a gusher of money. Each member of the tribe,
excepting married women who receive half the regular amount, is paid a monthly
dividend of $5,000.
The
investigators wonder how McDover could be corruptly involved. The casino is on
an Indian reservation with its own tribal court. Neither McDover nor the State
of Florida have any jurisdiction on the reservation. The Federal Government has
actually little interest in what is happening on the reservation.
McDover’s
role comes from her position in the county adjacent to the reservation. She
has a perfect record of deciding in favour of developers building golf courses,
condos and other developments. She can also disrupt the casino for she has the
authority to deal with issues involving the toll highway which is the only
access to the casino.
The judicial
corruption is connected to a shadowy group of developers. Myer advises they are the
descendants of the Catfish Mafia, a loosely organized crime gang, which has
moved to Florida and evolved into the Coast Mafia. Such is their discretion
they are but a rumour to legal authorities.
Can
Lacy and Hugo penetrate the carefully constructed web that conceals the
corruption?
The
conspiracy reminded me of Grisham’s book, The
Firm, which was set in Memphis and involved a Chicago crime family.
I
regret there is no action in a court. While I do admire his willingness to not
restrict his stories to trials and appeals I prefer Grisham’s books involving
court cases.
I
enjoyed the book and was glad it was not one of his books with an overtly
political point of view but it is not one of Grisham’s best.
There
is a flaw in the story in that there are so few people who
could be the “Deep Throat” source. In the Watergate scandal the source was
never identified until he revealed himself because there were so many possible
informants.
More
troubling was the last third of the book. It was an unfolding of the
inevitable. While I deplore implausible twists there was no effective drama to
conclude the book. For the first time in a long time I felt Grisham was just
writing a narrative in that portion of the book. It was a letdown.
I
do appear to be in a minority on Grisham’s latest books. In the New York Times
there was a glowing review of The
Whistler and the Times thought The
Whistler far better than Rogue Lawyer.
I disagree. I consider Rogue Lawyer much better than The Whistler.
****
Thanks, as ever, Bill, for your candor. I agree with you that Grisham's court scenes are memorable. The premise of this story is really intriguing, so I'm sorry to hear that the promise wasn't really fulfilled. Still, it sounds as though there are some well-drawn characters, and that counts for a lot.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. The characters are wonderful but Grisham could do better on the plot.
DeleteYour thoughts on this book are very interesting, Bill. I still have several books by Grisham that I haven't read yet. I will try harder in 2017 to actually get to them.
ReplyDeleteTracyK: Thanks for the comment. With at least a book a year by Grisham it is easy to end up with a TBR pile of his books.
DeleteLike Tracy, I am way behind! I like Grisham when I read him though. I think I would try Rogue Lawyer next, based on your reviews.
ReplyDeleteMoira: Good choice. I look forward to your thoughts.
ReplyDelete