Weave a Murderous Web by Anne Rothman-Hicks and Ken
Hicks – Jane Larson is a skilled and aggressive litigator in New York City.
Forsaking her mother Martha’s lifelong support for the poor and the weak Jane is
in a law firm devoted to the needs of corporate America.
Jane
has prospered in the lucrative world of commercial litigation:
Modesty does not forbid me from saying I tore the place up
and made Ridge look very good. It’s not that I am a genius. Rather, many
lawyers at big firms are scared to death to take cases into a courtroom for a
trial and I was not. I pushed my matters to conclusion like a muleskinner with
a whip and, as a result, the firm’s clients were very happy.
Jane
is lured by a legal assistant, Francine, into representing Francine’s friend, Gail
Hollings, caught up in a family law dispute with her ex-Larry over his claims
he cannot afford child support. Gail asserts he has abundant money from selling drugs.
Gail
successfully draws media attention to her cause by wearing outside and even
inside the courtroom:
…. dressed, if you could call it that, in the kind of
barrel contraption drawn in cartoons to represent those who have lost all they
own in the stock market. Like those cartoons, beneath that barrel she appeared
to be little except a flesh-colored spandex leotard that might keep her out of
jail, I supposed, but left no part of her well-constructed body to the
imagination.
Gail’s
young daughter, Courtney, is also in a barrel.
Though
the judge is mightily unimpressed a hearing is scheduled. Media coverage
generates a call to Jane with a tip on where to find at least a fair amount of
Larry’s hidden money.
I
appreciated Jane’s use of her legal skills to exploit the information and get
the court order needed to open up a safety deposit box containing thousands of
dollars. Little to follow involves legal talent.
Shortly
thereafter, Jane and a handsome young lawyer, Bryan, are in a street confrontation
with Larry in which she is almost shot. While at the hospital after the
incident Jane learns Larry has been murdered.
The rest
of the book sees Jane working to solve who, out of multiple candidates, killed
Larry.
Jane
reminded me of the wise cracking heroines of the 1940’s who are tough and quick
with a quip. At one point I wondered if the story actually was set 70 years ago
as there is reference to a typewriter and ribbon in Larry’s office. But such
modern technology as cell phones convinced me the story was in the present.
I
wanted Jane to be a great character. I liked her a lot but her breezy approach
to life does not work well for me in the 21st Century.
I
found myself wishing that the story was not about Jane dealing with some
ordinary mystery over the lost money of a ne’er do well, now I am drifting back
in time. I would have preferred to see Jane applying her wit and wisdom on some
major commercial malfeasance.
I
regret to say I found the reading a chore and the book took far longer to read
than it should have for me. I expect readers who want a lighter mystery with a
nifty heroine would enjoy Jane. Unfortunately, Weave a Murderous Web was not for me.
With most
of the characters handsome or beautiful I think the book would have worked
better as a television show.
The
back blurb says the authors “have been married for a little over forty years
and have produced about twenty books and exactly three children so far. At press-time,
they still love their children more”. I wish them well but will not be reading
another book by Ms. and Mr. Hicks.
Sorry to hear that this one didn't work better for you, Bill. The premise sounds rather interesting, but I know what you mean about more serious (is that the word?) characters. You make an interesting point about the story being more suitable for TV than for a novel. I've read books like that, and they haven't been as satisfying for me.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. I want every book with a lawyer to be a great book but it did not happen here. I rarely think turning a lawyer into a sleuth is a good idea.
DeleteI will trust your assessment of this one, Bill. Overall it sounds like the story is too lightweight for me.
ReplyDeleteTracyK: Thanks for the comment. Lightweight seems appropriate to me.
Delete