About Me

My photo
Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada
I am a lawyer in Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada who enjoys reading, especially mysteries. Since 2000 I have been writing personal book reviews. This blog includes my reviews, information on and interviews with authors and descriptions of mystery bookstores I have visited. I strive to review all Saskatchewan mysteries. Other Canadian mysteries are listed under the Rest of Canada. As a lawyer I am always interested in legal mysteries. I have a separate page for legal mysteries. Occasionally my reviews of legal mysteries comment on the legal reality of the mystery. You can follow the progression of my favourite authors with up to 15 reviews. Each year I select my favourites in "Bill's Best of ----". As well as current reviews I am posting reviews from 2000 to 2011. Below my most recent couple of posts are the posts of Saskatchewan mysteries I have reviewed alphabetically by author. If you only want a sentence or two description of the book and my recommendation when deciding whether to read the book look at the bold portion of the review. If you would like to email me the link to my email is on the profile page.

Friday, August 31, 2018

Paul Goldstein in Reverse

I like to read series in order. I can learn the primary characters and follow their development professionally and personally. Occasionally I will read a book later in a series. Usually it is because of a reading challenge or because it is involved in an Award where I read the shortlist. Only once have I read a series in reverse order. It is Paul Goldstein’s series of legal mysteries featuring intellectual property lawyer, Michael Seeley. I started reading the series with the third, Havana Requiembecause it won the Harper Lee Prize for Legal Fiction and went on to the second, A Patent Lie. My last two posts have formed a review of the first book in the series, Errors and Omissions.

(This post does not include spoilers that disclose the resolution of the three mysteries but it does provide details from all of the books. Someone reading them in order would be best advised not to read the post until they have concluded the series.)

I want to discuss the impact of reading the Michael Seeley series in reverse order.

Few lawyers in real life return to firms they have asked to leave because of their problems. It was with some surprise as I read Havana Requiem to learn that Seeley had come back to the large New York City firm – Boone, Bancroft – that had sent him away for alcohol abuse.

It would have been shocking to learn of his return if I had read Errors and Omissions before Havana Requiem. In the opening of Errors and Omissions Seeley is out of control. He drinks two tumblers of gin before going to court for a settlement conference.

While he does his best to stop drinking for the balance of the book he is not receiving professional assistance and is trying to quit on his own. His efforts are not enough to convince the firm to keep him. How can they trust him not to return to the bottle?

As well Seeley was disillusioned with the stress and financial demands of big firm practice. It was not a surprise in A Patent Lie the he had returned to his roots in Buffalo to be a solo practictioner working on the modest needs of individual clients.

He is drawn back to major litigation in A Patent Lie when he is asked to be lead trial counsel on a huge AIDS patent case in California.

I can understand his old firm’s interest in him after his success in California but many firms would not take the risk of his return. I admire the fictional firm for giving him another chance.

In Havana Requiem Seeley is caught up in a quest to regain the music rights for black Cuban composers lost since Castro took over Cuba in 1957.

While large firms will take on pro bono cases they are not known for idealism. Seeley sees a cause not merely a case.

I would have better understood the depths of his commitment to artists had I started with Errors and Omissions where he was anxious to take a case to trial on the moral rights of artists to control their works after sale. His eagerness to set a precedent prevented him from advising a client to accept a reasonable settlement.

In Errors and Omissions he is willing to turn away from a million dollar fee to help an author of movie screenplays blacklisted by Hollywood in the 1950’s.

A Patent Lie involves commercial law. While Seeley remains an idealist the plot does not relate to artists.

Real life lawyers are rarely in physical danger in their work. In the fictional intellectual property worlds created by Goldstein lawyers are at risk in every book.

I did not expect the violence Seeley experienced in in Havana Requiem. I would have been ready had I read the series in order.

In A Patent Lie Seeley is called out to California because the lead plaintiff lawyer in the patent action has died but two weeks before trial. Hit by a train his death has been ruled a suicide. The suspicions of mystery readers are immediately engaged.

In Errors and Omissions Seely has a pair of fights. They go poorly for him. While he is tenacious he is not a fighter. It would have been better for Seeley to have his creator provided him with a black belt in judo if his legal career was going to be so dangerous.

Havana Requiem emphasized the international nature of intellectual property law. The music written by Cuban musicians before the Revolution was being used 50 laters in American ads. The rights of the composers also involved the Cuban government of today.

In AIDS A Patent Lie vaccines have worldwide issues on availability and cost.

Errors and Ommissions set up the international issues of intellectual law expanded upon in the later books. In Errors and Omissions the opening court case was over the moral rights of artists with regard to their works after sale. In searching for precedents Seeley looked at how the issue had been dealt with in Europe.

While an interesting experience I am not planning a repeat of the reverse order reading of a series. In real life court cases I strive to organize the narrative chronologically rather than thematically. It is the way I best follow evidence. Reading the Seeley series in reverse reinforced my preference for reading a series in order. A topic for another day are authors who write a book or books in a series that are set earlier than the current state of the series.
Goldstein, Paul - (2013) - Havana Requiem and Goldstein's reaction on winning the Harper Lee Prize; (2014) - A Patent Lie and Patents and Vaccines and Ethics; (2018) - Errors and Omissions and Review of Errors and Omissions


  1. I liked A Patent Lie and Errors and Omissions a lot. The Cuba one, not so much. I didn't think it was realistic, having friends who have visited the island and had peaceful sojourns with no drama. Lots of music, art, food, dancing, conversation.

    But I liked the first two books and the lawyer. Wonder if more are to come by this writer.

    As far as lawyers facing violence, there have been many fictional attorneys in trouble. Read a Steve Martini book where the lawyer ends up in a jungle with armed gangsters after him. I think it was in that book where an earthquake saved him!

    In Michael Connelly's books, Mickey Haller is often in danger. In The Lincoln Lawyer, his friend and assistant is murdered and he is nearly killed.

    And in the latest Rosato and Nuncio book by Lisa Scottoline, both lawyers are kidnapped. One is not harmed much, the other has been wounded seriously.

    It seems as if practicing law is getting more dangerous -- at least in fiction.

    1. Kathy D.: Thanks for the comment. Fictional lawyers certainly are at more risk than real life lawyers. You provide apt examples. Perhaps the most famous is Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird in which he faces a mob to protect his African American client.

  2. I'm like you, Bill, in preferring to read a series in order. There may be one or a few things to be gained from reading out of order, but, to me, they don't outweigh the drawbacks. I like the development of characters over time, the story arcs an author can create, and so on. For me, reading a series in order also allows me to experience the series the way the author intended it. I've made exceptions, but as a rule, I like to read in order.

    1. Margot: Thanks for the comment. I will continue to read series as they move forward but will also try not to be so rigid as to miss chances to read an unfamiliar series because a book is well into the series.

  3. And the lovable, "reluctant" deense lawyer, Andy Carpenter, has quite a time in David Rosenfelt's books, the humor in and out of the courtroom is quite fun. Wish I had a book of his at hand on bad days.

    In "Rescued," he's up against a bad gang of criminals who have missiles in New Jersey and are out to get Carpenter.

    1. Kathy D.: Thanks for another example of a lawyer in peril. I expect putting the lawyer in physical danger helps get legal mysteries published.

  4. Rosenfelt's book "Rescued," which I just finished has an intricate web of deceit behind the murders. But Carpenter figures it out. It is such an enjoyable book. His sense of humor in and out of the courtroom is great. I was laughing so much.

    Also, several British readers are touting Steve Cavanaugh's books which feature a lawyer. The latest one, "Thirteen" has a serial killer -- not on trial -- but on the jury. Several readers recommend it. I see that Book Depository and Amazon have it. I can't wait.

    1. Kathy D.: Thanks for the comment. I have another legal mystery soon to be read but it is neither a Rsonsefelt nor a Cavanaugh.