A pair of brilliant new characters are introduced. Frans
Balder is a Swedish computer genius who has recently returned to Sweden from the United
States with a computer full of research on his breakthroughs in artificial
intelligence. He has come back to care for his young son, August, who has major
developmental issues.
Once August is in his custody Balder sees, to his
astonishment, that the 8 year old August can produce drawings of events that
are startling in their precision and accuracy. He also appears to have a genius
level talent with numbers.
There is a convincing evil organization, the Spider
Society, with Russian criminals at its core. Their successful efforts at
stealing leading computer technology are a real threat to the world. Their
connections with America’s NSA (National Security Agency) is truly frightening.
Balder had originally left Sweden over issues of
industrial espionage and theft of his research and had been in contact with
Lisbeth.
Lisbeth is back in hacking glory. She has been lured by
the Hacker Republic into launching a cyber-assault on the NSA. Using all of her
hacking skills she penetrates to the heart of the NSA. It does not read like a
fantasy.
Blomkvist is in a funk having not been involved a major
investigative reporting story for some time. He is stagnating.
Yet it did not all come together for me.
Balder’s death took one of the two most interesting
characters out of the book.
The mythic figure of “Thanos” leading the Spider Society
felt contrived. With the identity of numerous members known it was hard to
believe there was a secret leader.
Lisbeth becomes an almost conventional heroine in saving
August from harm. Lisbeth has never been conventional. She verges on the
maternal in her relationship with August.
Her ability to carry out despite multiple serious
injuries was too much the comic book hero of many contemporary thrillers.
It is a rather clumsy scenario when a young associate of
Balder, Linus Brandell, contacts Blomkvist to convince him that Balder is the
next great “scoop” for Millennium.
The introduction of a new family antagonist for Lisbeth
was my least favourite plot line and could have been omitted without damaging
the story.
The best part of the book was August’s relationship with
Lisbeth. Neither mind operates well in our world. Their capacities leave them
ill-equipped to function well in modern society. August, who may have Savant
Syndrome, is on the verge of being institutionalized.
Unlike the Supergun of Louise Penny’s most recent book,
The Nature of the Beast, the technologies at risk of theft in The Girl in the Spider’s Web are a danger to world security.
The book has an intriguing subplot on the continuing
travails of the magazine publishing industry. It is ever more difficult for a
thoughtful independent magazine such as Millennium
to survive in a media world driven by brief celebrity driven stories. A major
Norwegian media empire has taken a significant minority stake in the magazine.
Tension is rising between the business goals of the investors and the editorial
leadership of Blomkvist and Erika Berger.
Lagercrantz cannot quite draw together the threads of a
thriller like Larsson. I missed the driving momentum of the plots in the trilogy.
For the first time in a long time I felt a 400 page book
was not long enough for the plot. Larsson’s original trilogy averaged over 600
pages per book. Except for the last book in the trilogy I thought the lengths
suited the plots. The complexities of The
Girl in the Spider’s Web could not be properly developed in 400 pages.
I am not sure whether I will read another by Lagercrantz in the series.
As with most writers who try to carry on the series of a deceased author the
new story goes well but not great. I kept wishing the 4th book had
been the one Larsson had started before his death.
It is a shame that this book did not work well for you. I am still undecided as to whether I will read it. I usually don't read books when they first come out anyway, so I have plenty of time to decide.
ReplyDeleteTracyK: Thanks for the comment. Looking around the web abit I seem to be in a minority on The Girl in the Spider's Web.
DeleteThanks for your candor and your thoughtful review, Bill. I'm sorry to hear that this one didn't quite do it for you, although I must be honest and say I wasn't sure it would. I agree with you about follow-on books, in general. And you're right: Lisbeth has never been conventional. That's one thing that makes her character appealing.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. While you infrequently offer an opinion on a book I would be interested in your conclusions on The Girl in the Spider's Web.
ReplyDeleteBill, I read a couple of favourable reviews of this book though neither was enough to convince me to read it, especially since I still hadn't read Larsson’s trilogy. I know I'm being unfair when I say this, but I'm not inclined to read series books continued by other authors. I suppose, anyone who has read this book would wonder how Larsson would have written it, a point you have alluded to in your fine review.
ReplyDeletePrashant: Thanks for the comment. I hope you read the trilogy. They are exceptional books.
DeleteI was very skeptical and leery about reading this book, but I'm glad I did. I don't think it really got interesting until Lisbeth Salander entered the story.
ReplyDeleteI don't think Stieg Larsson's energy was duplicated, but there was enough substance to make it worthwhile. Salander is her usual brilliant self, without social skills.
Kathy D.: I do not regret reading the book but did not enjoy it as much as yourself. I thought Lagercrantz significantly softened Salander.
ReplyDelete