My previous two posts
have discussed the complex plot of Another
James. This post in the form of a letter to the author, Michael Helm,
contains my thoughts upon the book.
****
Melfort, Saskatchewan
Dear Michael,
As part of my annual
reading and reviewing I have been reading the shortlist for the 2017 Arthur
Ellis Award for Best Crime Fiction Novel. The second book I read from the
shortlist was your book, After James.
The last two posts on my
blog, Mysteries and More from Saskatchewan, deal with the plot of the book. My
third post will be this letter. If you are able to reply and agree to the
posting of your reply I will put it up on the blog.
I consider After James a finely written work of
literary fiction. My challenge in reading the book was that I was expecting to
read a work of criminal fiction since it was on the shortlist.
My expectations
interfered with my reading of the book. I kept expecting it to be crime fiction
I recognized and my expectations were never realized. Whether expectations
should have affected my reading is a reflection for a future post.
I see After James as exploring the mystery of
“mystical consciousness” - a phrase in the book I found apt. The first part of
the book explored in depth a drug induced state of such consciousness. Much of
the second part was focused on mystical consciousness in poetry. The third part
delved into the past for an apocalyptic vision of the future.
Unfortunately, I was
looking for a crime or crimes and their resolution rather than a philosophical
and literary exploration of the mysteries of mind and consciousness. Literary
fiction with mystery elements does not fit my conception of crime fiction.
The Crime Writers of Canada
set out the following with regard to criteria for the Arthur Ellis Awards:
The Arthur Ellis Awards are for CRIME WRITING,
and are not restricted to mystery writing. Crime-writing encompasses far more
than the traditional whodunit. The crime genre includes crime, detective,
espionage, mystery, suspense, and thriller writing, as well as fictional or
factual accounts of criminal doings and crime-themed literary works.
It is hard for me to see
why After James was submitted for the
Crime Fiction Novel Award. I am not saying crime fiction should be circumscribed
by rules such those put forward by Monsignor Knox in the 1930’s. I am in favour
of the definition of crime fiction being flexible but I find it a stretch to
see Another James as crime fiction.
Beyond the exploration
of mystical consciousness there are factual mysteries being “investigated” in
each section of After James but they
are the settings for penetrating the human mind. Am I being too literal in
expecting the plot of a book being considered for Best Crime Novel to have a
crime or crimes at the heart of the book?
If having a series of
unsolved mysteries was to reflect the ambiguity in real life of resolving crime
it was too obscure a theme for me. I waited in vain to see a recognizable plot
of crime fiction in After James. Looking
back on the shortlists I have read in recent years I never had difficulty in
seeing them as crime fiction.
In the introduction to
an interview with you on CBC radio the host, Shelagh Rogers, echoed several
reviewers in saying the book has elements of the mystery, gothic horror and
apocolpytic genres.
You told her that you sort
of like reading detective novels. You continued that you love reading the first
half of detective novels but usually get bored at that point.
I want to ask you
directly whether you consider After James
a work of crime fiction. If you do I would appreciate your thoughts on what
makes the book crime fiction.
For most purposes I do
not think designating a book as being a part of a genre significant but when
Awards are being given I think it is important that the book be a part of the
genre for which the Award is being given.
Before closing I did not
realize, until doing some research on your life, that we share growing up in
rural Saskatchewan and holding a degree from the University of Saskatchewan.
Thank you for
considering my letter.
Regards.
Bill Selnes
****
As I put up this post I do not have a reply from Michael. Should he reply and agree to the response being posted I will put it up in a later post.
****
Helm, Michael - (2017) - Another James and Continuing on Another James
You raise an interesting point, Bill. The definition of what makes a book crime fiction isn't easy, because there are so many different ways in which crime can be woven into a story, as you point out. I'll be really interested in what Michael Helm might have to say about this.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. Definitions can be narrow or broad but for Awards I believe there needs to be a reasonably clear definition.
DeleteAll of this is very interesting, Bill. I do find that my expectations when starting to read a book can hamper my enjoyment. That is one reason I avoid blurbs and read as little about the book as is possible. That doesn't always help though.
ReplyDeleteTracyK: Thanks for the comment. I follow the same approach. When I read reviews I try to read just enough to know whether I might want to read the book. For bloggers in whom I have confidence I mainly want to know until I have read a book is whether they recommend it.
Delete