Detective
Chief Superintendent Robert MacFarlane from the Special Branch has summoned her
as she is named in a letter referring to the suicide and threatening harm
unless the Government takes action to recognize and aid the unemployed starting
with the thousands of veterans still suffering from their war injuries. With no
government prepared to take action because of blackmail the search is on for
the letter writer.
While
the police and military intelligence check out groups on the margin – fascists,
communists, IRA and suffragettes – Maisie looks among the host of injured
veterans.
Winspear
does not identify the writer but inserts passages from his powerfully written
journal expressing his ever increasing rage and frustration over the
government’s inaction. As the new year approaches he writes:
I
have no further use of this life, of this body, or of this mind. But before I
go, before I decline the opportunity to step forward into another year of
sidelong glances and piteous abuse, I will make my mark. You will be sorry, so
sorry not to have listened to me. I wanted only to be heard, only to be heard
on behalf of those who cannot speak, the men whom war has crippled and poverty
has silenced. There will be no parties, no gathering of joyous anticipation for
us, the forgotten. So I will stop the big party. For Auld Lang Syne.
Like
George Wilcox, the murderer in The
Suspect by L.R. Wright we feel his need to strike out. We cannot support
his actions but can understand his pain.
The
situation sharply escalates when the writer demonstrates the ability to
manufacture the types of poison gases used on the Western Front. Few mysteries
have dealt with the consequences of the gas attacks of WW I. They are a horror
far beyond the perils of bullets and bombs and shells.
What
is the morality for a government which developed and used these weapons of mass
destruction during the war and now is threatened by them?
The book explores the mental
devastation of so many veterans. The diagnosis of that era, shell shock, is far
more evocative of the damage done by war to the mind than the current phrasing
of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Only a fraction of the soldiers
suffering from shell shock have been accepted by the medical establishment as
so afflicted. Thousands barely exist in London. Too many are denied pensions.
Others function, even appear to be
doing well for periods of time, but have never recovered from the war. Their
minds are broken.
Personally, I recall a resident of
Meskanaw who, in the language of my youth in the 1960’s, was described as
having “nerves” as a result of action in World War II. I knew a woman who had
been an air raid warden during the London blitz who could not be in a room
where balloons were popping 40 years after the war.
Winspear brilliantly shows it was
not only the soldiers whose mental health was damaged by the war. She has not
yet fully recovered from her injuries and the loss of her love, Simon. She is
still working through grief 13 years after war’s end and unable to have a
normal relationship with a man. Yet she is making progress:
Looking into the past was like looking into a long tunnel,
and she knew the tragedy of his wounding and his passing no longer touched her
with such immediate rawness. It was more akin to an ache that came and went,
like a breeze that lifts a lace curtain back from the window, then sets it down
again.
Her best friend, Priscilla, seeing
her three sons soon to be teenagers finds herself depressed as she reflects
their futures on the deaths of her three brothers during the war.
While her assistant, Billy Beale, is
doing better his wife, Doreen, who struggled to cope with the problems he
brought home from the war is now increasingly depressed over the death of their
daughter.
Maisie speaks of the loss of the
soul for the most damaged yet the characters do not look to a common support. Winspear’s
characters are not typical of their time in that none attend church nor seek
comfort in the Christian faith. In the 1930’s most people went to church. To
have none in the book was unlikely.
Among
the Mad is a return to the quality of the earliest
books in the series. Maisie is doing her best to heal the wounded souls around
her as she solves the mystery. The book’s themes resonate 80 years later as
nations around the world deal with the traumas of war veterans.
The title was perfect for the book.
It was the best title for a book I have read in 2012. (Dec. 2/12)
Bill - I'm very glad this one lived up to its promise. What an interesting focus on what used to be called 'shell shock.' We understand it better now of course, but I like the way Winspear uses, if I may put it this way, the eyes of the between-war-years to discuss this kind of mental illness, loss and so on. Thanks for this fine review.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. I wonder how much understanding there is of PTSD. There are so many cases being diagnosed.
ReplyDeleteYou make a good case for this book but I have not enjoyed my forays into this series (one and a half books) - I found they ascribed too many modern ideas and behaviours to the period - and Maisie seemed to undergo every single experience possible for someone in her time to the point I did not believe in her. But you do tempt me to have another go
ReplyDeleteBernadette: Thanks for the comment. You make an apt point on modern ideas and behaviours. I am going to keep your comment in mind when I read the next in the series.
ReplyDelete