The
late pope, a character clearly inspired by the current Pope Francis, had
agitated the upper leadership of the Church. His willingness to consider and
occasionally embrace change has upset the traditionalists. His commitment to
reforming the finances of the Church has scared the many who have profited from
their positions. The Church is among the world’s most bureaucratic of
institutions at the Vatican.
An
unsettled Church must now select a new pope through a conclave of the cardinals
who are under 80 years of age.
Cardinal
Lomelli, as Dean, organizes and presides over the conclave. Following precise
rules set down over centuries he prepares the Sistine Chapel for the voting and
the Casa Santa Marta as the residence for the cardinals.
Over
the next 3 weeks 117 cardinals arrive in Rome from all the corners of the
world. Among Lomelli’s first surprises is the arrival of Vincent Benitez from
Iraq. He provides documentation that the deceased pope had recently created him
a cardinal in pectore (in his heart).
It is an appointment where the pope, usually for the safety of the new
cardinal, does not announce the appointment even to the highest ranking members
of the Curia. There will be 118 voters.
For
the election each cardinal is to look into his conscience and vote for the
cardinal he considers best. Campaigning is discreet but fierce. Will the papacy
be returned to an Italian after a trio of non-Italian popes? Could it be a
cardinal chosen from one of the First
World countries who have never had a pope? Can the cardinals support a candidate
from one of the poorest nations of the world?
What
struck me was the measured pace of a vote for each and every ballot. Each of
the names of the cardinals is called out and he affirms his presence. Each
writes his chosen name on a ballot and, in order of seniority, individually
goes to the urn and deposits the ballot. Those counting the vote announce the
name on a ballot as it is unfolded. It is a ritual so different from modern
voting practices where large groups vote with the push of a button and the
results are tallied instantly. Each vote of the conclave takes hours. The process
offers time for contemplation and prayer.
With
the cardinals sequestered from the world there is never a break from the
intensity of the decision. They eat, talk and vote together.
Unexpected
issues arise that affect the leading candidates. The cardinals are not without
sin. It is a thriller but with a stately tempo. Bodies do not fill the Sistene Chapel.
I
appreciated how Harris creates a tension that builds and builds. I wish more
thriller writers could accept tension does not have to result from constant
violent action.
I
found myself anxious to know the result of the next ballot. Harris convincingly
places the shifting vote totals between the traditionalists, the progressives
and the non-aligned.
As
a Catholic I appreciated his balanced approach. Many writing about the Church
today can focus on no more than scandals. Little regard is given to the
dedicated religious who work to meet the spiritual and temporal needs of the faithful.
Harris
writes so well of historic events. He effortlessly inserts information that
enhances the plot. However, I was disappointed in the ending. There was one
twist too many with that final twist a contrived political statement about the
Church. It spoiled my enjoyment of a well written book. But for the conclusion
Harris had a great book.
****
It certainly sounds well-written, Bill. And what an interesting topic - the selection of a new pope. It's a process that a lot of people don't know much about, and might find fascinating. And like you, I appreciate an author who creates a balanced book that explores many sides of a topic.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. I forget how many people are not familiar with the processes of the Catholic Church.
DeleteI share your enjoyment of this, though not sure about the final twist. But it is extraordinary how Harris makes such a straightforward, repetitious process so impelling and tense. I don't know how he does it!
ReplyDeleteMoira: Thanks for the comment. I think Harris has a respect for the power of facts and is willing to build a plot from facts rather than feeling compelled to embellish them. My regret with the book is that he slipped from that principle at the end.
DeleteI didn't enjoy it as much as you did Bill but do agree with much of what you say anyway - including the ending which I found plain stupid.
ReplyDeleteBernadette: Thanks for your forthright comment. "Plain stupid" puts it well.
DeleteI encourage readers of this blog to head over to your fine blog to read your review. It provides a strong perspective on the book.