After James by Michael Helm
– The most challenging book I have read in a long time. After James was the second book I have read on the Arthur Ellis
Best Crime Fiction Novel shortlist for 2017. Its complexity means the posts I
will write about the book contain spoilers.
The
book opens like a mystery with a dog finding the body of a woman in a shallow
grave. The dog is shot by an unknown killer. The bodies of the dog and woman
are cremated.
The
story proceeds with Alice, a scientist with a big pharmaceutical company in
Vancouver. She has left the company over its actions with regard to a drug she
has designed, “a narcotic-free neuroenhancer of generative and lateral thought.
A creativity pill”. She is now “somewhere north of Georgia, south of the
Canadian Shield”.
She
describes her drug in a letter she is drafting to a whistleblower site:
In time it took
form as a rectangular yellow pill with bevelled edges. She didn’t include (in
the letter) the company’s name for the drug – Claritas .4 – it would identify
Gilshey (it would come out in time, of course), and anyway it was the wrong
name. The name that came to her was Alph. She designed the drug. It should have
the name she gave it.
Its
effects are intense:
Almost
three-quarters of volunteers reported a “jump cut” feeling of having lost two
or three seconds of time during composition. Many reported a sense of lucid
dreaming while awake. The feeling was of some other agent authoring a part of their
experience, their sense of self-command undermined by changing contexts,
parallel realities. One described his lab session, going to play tennis, and in
the middle of a long rally seeing himself in a staged swordfight against dozens
of foes, as if in an old swashbuckler movie. In the lab they called this the
Daffy effect, in reference to the Loony
Tunes segment in which Daffy and his world are repeatedly redrawn by the
animator midstory.
The
designers speak of the drug as “an engine to accelerate the real”.
Alice
is concerned over the mind altering effects of the drug. She takes the drug.
The results are startling. To this moment the book has an intriguing crime
fiction premise related to a death, big pharma, Aleph and a whistleblower.
Instead
of continuing with that plot line, while under the effects of the drug, Alice
follows up on information left behind by the wife of a couple, gone to Africa
on a mission, with regard to a mysterious neighbour and his Russian wife.
Eventually she meets the neighbour, Clay Shoad, a sculptor recovering from
serious injuries.
Dominating
his work is an amazing work:
… the shape
resolved into a sculpture made from antlers wired together to form, through
some closed loop of conception, a giant deer buck. It was ten feet high at the
shoulder, fourteen or more at the top of its rack.
Is
Alice, alone with Shoad, in danger? The implication of the opening supports
risk but there is no more to this story.
Abruptly,
just over hundred pages into the story James is introduced:
In truth I am
only a failed poet. A failed many things. Bartender, textbook editor, doctoral
student, orchestrat publicist. I have no talent but reading.
He
has recently been orphaned. His parents died, ostensibly in a car accident,
while working at a Turkish refugee camp near Syria.
James
is hired by August Durant to analyze the poems of a poetry website, Three
Sheets. Durant believes the anonymous poet has written poems that will explain
why Durant’s daughter has disappeared three years earlier.
(My
next post continues my review.)
This does sound like a complex plot, Bill. Some of the plot strands are really interesting, too. It can be challenging to keep multiple plot strands going and weave them all together, so I'll be really interested in how that happens here.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. This book is going to generate at least three posts for me to explain my thoughts.
DeleteThe set-up sounds intriguing, but I'd love to hear why you found it challenging - the complexity of the plot or was it something else?
ReplyDeleteMarina: Thanks for the comment. You are a good internet detective. While the complexity is part of the challenge there is another issue. I am not trying to be coy. I will set out my explanation of "challenging" in my 2nd or 3rd post on the book.
Delete