About Me

My photo
Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada
I am a lawyer in Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada who enjoys reading, especially mysteries. Since 2000 I have been writing personal book reviews. This blog includes my reviews, information on and interviews with authors and descriptions of mystery bookstores I have visited. I strive to review all Saskatchewan mysteries. Other Canadian mysteries are listed under the Rest of Canada. As a lawyer I am always interested in legal mysteries. I have a separate page for legal mysteries. Occasionally my reviews of legal mysteries comment on the legal reality of the mystery. You can follow the progression of my favourite authors with up to 15 reviews. Each year I select my favourites in "Bill's Best of ----". As well as current reviews I am posting reviews from 2000 to 2011. Below my most recent couple of posts are the posts of Saskatchewan mysteries I have reviewed alphabetically by author. If you only want a sentence or two description of the book and my recommendation when deciding whether to read the book look at the bold portion of the review. If you would like to email me the link to my email is on the profile page.

Thursday, September 30, 2021

The Madness of Crowds by Louise Penny


(30. - 1102.) The Madness of Crowds by Louise Penny - Armand and Marie-Reine Gamache are back in Three Pines. Most important, their newest grandchild, Idola, is present. Idola has Down Syndrome. They love her fiercely.

Colette Roberge, the Chancellor of the Université de l’Estrie, has asked for Armand, Chief Inspectior of the Homicide Division of the Sûreté du Quebec, to provide security for a public address being given by a statistician, Abigail Robinson. She has analyzed massive amounts of information on societies, trends and the Covid pandemic. She has taken a phrase of hope for recovery from the pandemic, All will be well, and twisted it into a phrase supporting her thesis that for the world to recover from the pandemic and thrive there needs to be “mercy” killings, especially of the aged, and abortions of the deformed unborn. Those who burden society are to be removed.


Annie and Jean-Guy, the daughter and son-in-law of the Gamaches, are the parents of Idola. Jean-Guy feels guilty about considering Idola a “burden”. He and Annie had considered abortion when they learned she had Down’s Syndrome but felt it wrong to abort when the baby was developing normally in every other way.


Wisely preparing for the worst, Armand has dozens of agents at the hall where Robinson is to speak to an overflowing crowd. 


Robinson avoids rhetoric and incendiary statements. She is mild in speech going through her statistical analysis dispassionately. She is convincing because she appears and speaks rationally. Moral consequences do not fit into statistics. While most are repelled by her conclusions, there are many eager to embrace them:


Of course, if Professor Robinson’s findings were implemented, it meant the right to die became the obligation to die, but sacrifices needed to be made. In a free society.


Whose life should be considered not worthy? Robinson’s statistics tell her.


As she moves into her address firecrackers provide distraction and then two shots are fired at Robinson.


Armand and his team are protecting a woman whose views Armand abhors. He had experienced the official indifference to the fate of the elderly and infirm in Quebec nursing homes who died in droves early in the pandemic. And there is Idola.


While Robinson would kill thousands, even millions, for the greater good who would kill to thwart the spread of her ideas.


Penny creates an amazing New Year’s Eve party. Everyone from the village gathers at the Auberge. An intellectual confrontation over scientific “facts” and “truths” takes place while the children of the village, carrying on a Québecois tradition, act out a fable which this year is “The Animals Sick of the Plague”.


There has been grave debate within the celebration of the new year. Whether goodness is fragile. Will a death end a movement or create a martyr for the cause? 


Then murder is done in the woods outside the inn. All present are suspects as no one is sure whether the deceased was the intended victim and fierce emotions are swirling about that might sway any of them to kill


Robinson has caused an emotional reckoning of the worth of lives. 


A retired doctor, Vincent Gilbert, provides a description of those with Down Syndrome:


“They’re kind. Content. They don’t judge. They don’t hide their feelings. There’s no hidden agenda. Complete acceptance. If that isn’t grace, I don’t know what is. I’m not saying people with Down Syndrome are perfect or always easy. That would be to trivalize them, make them sound like pets. What I am saying is that in my experience they make better humans than most.”


Everyone has a family member who is profoundly disabled. It may be a child or an adult or a senior. Penny provides examples from the families of the characters. A chill went through me as I thought of Penny’s brilliant husband, Michael, who endured a devastating decline with Alzheimer’s. How Penny and friends worked together to keep him safe and comfortable and loved at home. And how he died with Penny holding his hand.


On virtually every page there is a scene or a conversation or a reflection that caused me to lift my eyes from the book and think upon what I had just read. There were pages where I murmured aloud with wonderment.


The startling depths of connections between the characters are amazing. Intricate but never implausible. Suffering going back generations is revealed.


The Madness of Crowds is a return to my favourite books in the series where Armand solves a challenging crime with his brains - where his mind is more important than his gun.


Amidst the exploration of great questions of life and death and investigation of murder Penny emphasizes the small joys of family and community life. Taking a grandchild out for a toboggan ride. Blueberry pancakes and maple smoked bacon for breakfast.


(It is a book so rich in storylines and characters that I need another two posts to set out my reactions and thoughts upon the book.)

****

Penny, Louise – (2005) - Still Life; (2006) - Dead Cold (Tied for 3rd Best fiction of 2006); (2007) - The Cruelest Month; (2009) - The Murder Stone (Tied for 4th Best fiction of 2009); (2010) - The Brutal Telling; (2011) - Bury Your Dead (Best Fiction of 2011); (2011) - A Trick of the Light; (2012) - The Beautiful Mystery (Part I) and The Beautiful Mystery (Part II); (2013) - "P" is for Louise Penny - Movie Producer and Review of the Movie of Still Life; (2013) - How the Light Gets In; (2014) - The Long Way Home; (2014) - The Armand Gamache Series after 10 Mysteries - Part I and Part II; (2015) - The Nature of the Beast (Part I) and The Nature of the Beast (Part II); (2016) - A Great Reckoning - The Academy and Comparisons and The Map; (2016) - Louise Penny and Michael Whitehead Holding Hands; (2017) - Glass Houses - Happiness and Unhappiness and Getting the Law Wrong; (2019) - Kingdom of the Blind and Irreconcilable Dispositions; (2019) - A Better Man; (2020) - All the Devils are Here and Relationship Restaurants in Fiction and Real Life and Reading of the Marais Simultaneously; Hardcover

10 comments:

  1. You can tell a novel is excellent, Bill, when it causes you to stop and think and reflect as you're reading it. And Penny really does tackle some important issues here. I'm not surprised that you found the characters to be so well-developed and interlinked; she does that very well. And it sounds as though this is a rich story, even with the controversial issues aside. This shows just how skilled Louise Penny really is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Margot: Thanks for the comment. Not many novels cause me to pause. So many storylines and issues all revolving around the murder. It is a great book.

      Delete
  2. I too have enjoyed and appreciated how Louise never forget to intersperse the murder plots with joys of living life.
    And my goodness, three posts to communicate your thoughts. This is setting high expectation for the book sitting on my TBR pile!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anthony: Thanks for the comment. I will be interested in your thoughts when you reach the book. I expect it will provoke lots of thoughts for you.

      Delete
  3. My mother got dementia in her later years. She was able to live in a wonderful assisted living facility with such good care, daily activities, musical performances, etc.

    I wish everyone so diabled could live like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kathy D.: Thanks for the comment. I am grateful she received the care she needed and deserved. Our society and our families still fail too many of our most vulnerable.

      Delete
  4. I don't know about Canada, but that is true here, too. Occasionally, an investigation shows some awful conditions in a nursing home or other facilities for the elderly and ill. And agencies hired to take care of sick people often don't do what they are supposed to, and the NY Times has exposed them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kathy D.: Thanks for the comment. We have our own challenges in elder care but no one goes bankrupt because they go to a nursing home.

      Delete
  5. I would imagine Canada has better elder care, one reason being that you have free, universal health care.
    Here, unfortunately, care is based on money. My mother, fortunately, could afford the assisted living facility that is so nice. But so many people can't afford that and are shunted off to neglectful, short-staff nursing homes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kathy D.: We are willing to spend more money on care for all. For many seniors it means a comfortable old age.

      Delete