About Me

My photo
Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada
I am a lawyer in Melfort, Saskatchewan, Canada who enjoys reading, especially mysteries. Since 2000 I have been writing personal book reviews. This blog includes my reviews, information on and interviews with authors and descriptions of mystery bookstores I have visited. I strive to review all Saskatchewan mysteries. Other Canadian mysteries are listed under the Rest of Canada. As a lawyer I am always interested in legal mysteries. I have a separate page for legal mysteries. Occasionally my reviews of legal mysteries comment on the legal reality of the mystery. You can follow the progression of my favourite authors with up to 15 reviews. Each year I select my favourites in "Bill's Best of ----". As well as current reviews I am posting reviews from 2000 to 2011. Below my most recent couple of posts are the posts of Saskatchewan mysteries I have reviewed alphabetically by author. If you only want a sentence or two description of the book and my recommendation when deciding whether to read the book look at the bold portion of the review. If you would like to email me the link to my email is on the profile page.

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

The Widow by John Grisham (The Wills)

(3. - 1292.) The Widow by John Grisham - 

“Bankruptcies, drunk driving charges, delinquent child support, foreclosures, nickel-and-dime car wrecks, suspicious slip-and-falls, dubious claims of disabilities - the stock-in-trade of a run-of-the-mill street lawyer whose law school dreams of riches had faded so dim they were almost gone. Eighteen years into the grind and Simon  F. Latch, Attorney and Counselor (both) at Law, was burning out. He was weary of other people’s problems.”

I consider Grisham’s characterization of Latch’s practice as cruel. Latch’s practice deals with the issues of people. It is not as dramatic as big injury claims, murder trials, major human rights issues, important constitutional issues and colourful family law battles. While I have had experiences with dramatic cases Simon’s practice is close to my own. I am proud to represent people.

There was so much of interest to me in The Widow it will take three posts to say all I wanted.

Simon is 41 and a solo practictioner in Braxton, Virginia.

He has an experienced reliable personal assistant in Matilda “Tillie” Clark.

Ms. Eleanor “Netty” Barnett comes to see him to do a will. He expects a simple will will suffice. She has outlived two husbands. She has two stepsons whom she loathes. She has a modest home.

Everything changes when he asks if she has investments other than her home. She advises him that she has $10,000,000 in Coca-Cola shares, $6,000,000 in Wal-Mart shares and $4,000,000 in the bank. 

Her second husband was a district sales rep for Coca-Cola and received shares and held them. Observing Wal-Mart sold “a lot of soft drinks” he started buying shares.

They lived modestly and never cashed in on the steady increase in value of the investments.

She is uneasy about the will she did with another solo practitioner across the street, Wally Thackerman, who “convinced” her to leave her entire estate “to him, in trust” so “he would have the authority to give the money to my favourite charities” and included a cash bequest to him for $485,000.

She has no favourite charities.

Wondering what the net value of the estate after taxes would be, he finds out from a legal friend that the estate of anyone who dies in the next 12 months will not be taxed as Congress had not extended an estate tax statute.

Simon writes a will with him as trustee and estate counsel but giving the money to charities and family members. He includes a clause revoking any bequest to someone who unsuccessfully challenges the will. He would like to be as brazen as Wally but fears the inevitable court challenges. He will make his money off running the estate and having his fees approved by the court.

I was upset with Wally’s will and uncomfortable with Simon’s will. In Canada Wally would be in trouble the moment he tried to probate a will which effectively has no beneficiaries beyond the huge cash bequest to himself.

Simon was dealing with an awkward situation. I have had clients who had neither family nor friends they trust to handle their affairs and wanted my involvement. I avoid involvement. Most Saskatchewan lawyers would do the same. If the client continues to want me involved I would arrange independent legal advice for the client before proceeding with any personal involvement. Even with a client having independent legal advice I doubt I would be willing to be the executor for a “Netty”.

Simon has had a sham of a marriage. Simon and his wife, Paula, strapped for money, have remained officially a couple. They spend as little time together as possible. He is often at their home, usually when she is gone, and sleeps at his office in an improvised tiny apartment he calls “The Closet”. He has a 9 year old daughter, Janie, and two loutish teenage sons, Buck and Danny.

Simon and Paula decide to divorce. The pages describing explanations to the children were painful and poignant and completely convincing.

Simon is a sports gambler. He considers himself skilled but does moderate research. His bets are actual gambles. Because of innate caution and fear of Paula finding out about his betting he had not been in gambling trouble.

Summer and fall go by with Simon and Paula bickering, Simon in a constant cash crunch and Netty regularly going for lunches with Simon paid for by Simon.

Aging is getting more complicated for Netty. A series of traffic tickets are looming. Her ability to drive is at risk.

After I wondered through many pages why Simon has not been billing for all their consultations he sends her a bill.

The story is proceeding at a measured pace when Netty is in a car accident and hospitalized. Expectations for a swift recovery are wrong.

The next post will cover what happens with Netty.

****

Grisham, John – (2000) - The Brethren; (2001) - A Painted House; (2002) - The Summons; (2003) - The King of Torts; (2004) - The Last Juror; (2005) - The Runaway Jury; (2005) - The Broker; (2008) - The Appeal; (2009) - The Associate; (2011) - The Confession; (2011) - The Litigators; (2012) - "G" is for John Grisham - Part I and Part II; (2013) - The Racketeer; (2013) - Grisham's Lawyers; (2013) - Analyzing Grisham's Lawyers; (2013) - Sycamore Row; (2014) - Gray Mountain and Gray Mountain and Real Life Legal Aid; (2015) - Rogue Lawyer and Sebastian Rudd; (2016) - The Whistler; (2017) - Camino Island; (2017) - The Rooster Bar and Law Students and Integrity; (2019) - The Reckoning; (2019) - Cullen Post in The Guardians and The Guardians; (2020) - A Time for Mercy and Practising Law in Rural Mississippi and Rural Saskatchewan and Writing a Credible Trial; (2021) - Camino Winds; (2022) - The Judge's List; (2022) - The Biloxi Boys and Body Counts in Fictional Gang Wars (Ian Hamilton, John Grisham and Don Winslow); (2023) - The Exchange

No comments:

Post a Comment