The Red
Sparrow movie is a rare prediction come true for me.
After reading the book by Jason Matthews in 2013 I wrote in my review that I
thought Hollywood would be interested in the movie and earlier this year the
movie was released. Regrettably I find more flaws than merit in the movie.
I thought Hollywood actresses would be eager
to play Dominka Egorova. Jennifer Lawrence was chosen for the role. She has the
beauty described in the book. I was disappointed by her almost stoic portrayal.
In the book Dominka is passionate, reckless at times. For much of the movie I
found Lawrence passive.
I understand the challenge of portraying her experiences
at Sparrow School. The training in sexual techniques and seductive intrigues is
soul destroying. It was no surprise that the movie softened Sparrow School. It
was uncomfortable to read the details of Sparrow education. The Dominka of the
book and movie had to suppress emotion to survive the School.
After Sparrow School the Dominka of the book
was far more vital than the Dominka of the movie. A powerfully dramatic woman
was not upon the screen.
I believe Lawrence’s character development
was limited by the constraints of a 2 hour 20 minute movie. The complex plot of
the book, Red Sparrow, would have
been better developed in a mini-series in the way John Le Carre’s book, The Night Manager, was turned into a
vivid and compelling English mini-series.
The whole movie had a choppy quality. Plot
lines could barely progress before it was on to the next scene.
A vital part of the book was the tension
involving an existing mole America had recruited in Russian intelligence. There
was no time to explore the role and importance of the mole in the movie.
As in the book Dominka and Nathaniel Nash
become lovers in the movie. However, the movie format compressed the
relationship. Moving from professional adversaries to lovers was so abrupt.
There is pulsing passion in the book between
Dominka and Nathaniel in the book. I did not see chemistry between Lawrence and
Joel Edgerton in the movie. Chemistry is unpredictable between actors and I did
not feel the spark between the stars.
It would have been fascinating in the movie
to see Dominka utilize her powers as a synaesthete. In the book she sees auras
about the heads of everyone she meets that reflect their personalities and
integrity. I am sure with modern special effects halos or auras could have been
created.
I wondered if President Putin would have been
a character in the movie. In the book and subsequent books of the trilogy he
has been an important character. I have written of my surprise that he is named
and described so negatively in the books. As Hollywood is more risk averse than
book publishers Putin is not a character in Red
Sparrow.
I thought the book was halfway between a
thriller and a gritty espionage story. The movie is definitely a thriller.
I was surprised by the ending. It was
Hollywood and better than the ending of the book.
Overall, I would not recommend spending money
to watch the movie.
On whether there will be a trilogy of movies
there was an interview of the director of Red
Sparrow in Metro:
Clearly Francis Lawrence is a fan of these follow-up books.
Because during my recent discussion with the director he
admitted that he is interested in doing a sequel to "Red
Sparrow" based on either "Palace of Treason" or "The
Kremlin's Candidate".
As to the likelihood of more movies in the
trilogy, on The Rotten Tomatoes
website about half of the critics and half of the audience liked Red Sparrow. It is faint praise to be
barely passing. Most important the movie cost $69 million to make and grossed
about $164 million in worldwide sales.
I wish there would be a sequel just to see
how Putin would be portrayed. It would be hard, though not impossible for
Hollywood, to delete him from the plot of Palace
of Treason.
I will be surprised if Palace of Treason becomes a movie.
****
Matthews, Jason - (2013) - Red Sparrow and Recipes and Menus in Spy Thrillers; (2015) - Palace of Treason and Vladimir Putin in Spy Fiction and Libel (Part I and Part II and Part III); (2018) - The Kremlin's Candidate
I'm sorry to hear you didn't like the film better than you did, Bill. I have to say, though, that I'm not surprised. When a book has a complex plot, it's hard, as you say, to portray it with the right depth and interest in one 2-hour film. I've had that experience with other films I've seen. Hmm....no, I think I'll leave this one alone.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. I think you will be glad you spend your viewing time watching another movie.
DeleteInteresting Bill - I always enjoy a detailed comparison between a film and book, even if I haven't seen/read either.
ReplyDeleteMoira: Thanks for the comment. More sex and violence in book and movie than interesting clothes.
DeleteI still haven't decided if I want to see this movie or not. My husband and I usually like thrillers (on film) but I had heard that this one featured too much sex and violence (for me). The same for the book though; I enjoyed reading it but still too much violence and sex.
ReplyDeleteTracyK: Thanks for the comment. More sex and violence in the book. I will be surprised if you like the movie but would appreciate your thoughts.
Delete