(34.
– 964.) The Kremlin’s Candidate by
Jason Matthews – Can Russia get a mole appointed director of the CIA? An
implausible premise has become frightenly realistic in the past two years.
At
the same time could the CIA get a mole chosen to lead a Russian intelligence
agency? I find it no more incredible than the Russian gambit.
Matthews,
in the concluding volume of the Red Sparrow trilogy, has the U.S. and Russia
each with a highly placed mole within the other nation.
The
Russian’s code name for their American mole is MAGNIT.
The
Americans identify Dominka Egorova as DIVA.
Egorova,
as beautiful and tempestuous as she was in the first two volumes, has despite
the chauvinism of Russian intelligence agencies continued to be promoted and is
now a senior officer in the SVR. Her career has been boosted by the personal
interest taken in her by President Putin. The CIA loves the information she
provides but are uneasy she will be unmasked as a mole.
While
Putin plays a lesser role than in Palace
of Treason, the second in the series, Egorova anticipates Putin’s personal
interest in her career is expanding to a personal interest in her.
Matthews
continues to directly disparage Putin by name. After Palace of Treason drew no defamation action I expect Matthews and the
publishers concluded the Russian President would not sue them.
Some
years ago in Russia Egorova, using her Sparrow sexual skills, aided in the
recruitment of Audrey Rowland, when she was a Lieutenant Junior Grade in the
American navy. Rowland has benefited from the efforts of America’s military to
become less chauvinist. She has been rapidly promoted in the Navy and is now a
rear admiral. Egorova has no idea that Rowland has become the most valuable
asset of Russian intelligence.
With
each nation constantly searching for moles which nation’s mole will be the
first to uncover the other’s mole.
Each
nation’s intelligence leadership eagerly awaits the promotion of their
respective mole to a position where they can reveal moles in the other nation.
At
the same time, contrary to all logic but that of thrillers Egorova and Nate
Nash of the CIA remain lovers. The beautiful Russian and the handsome American
have a Hollywood appeal though the movie, Red
Sparrow, was as set out in Wikipedia, a “modest box-office success”.
Nash
remains a field officer in the CIA. He dreads becoming an administrator.
For
some reason the focus of the plot shifts from the competing mole hunts to
exploits of Egorova and Nash. They are well done espionage schemes but most are
little connected to the primary plot.
Could
it because of a reluctance to show the successes of a Russian mole in
Washington?
It
is a rare American in the book who is not good, let alone evil, and even rarer
for a Russian character not to be bad.
Egorova
and Nash are more complex characters in this volume of the trilogy.
I wish the secondary characters were more dimensional.
There
is one fascinating subplot. Nash is sent on a false flag initiative to attempt
to recruit a Chinese general for the CIA. Using his Russian language skills he
pretends to be a Russian agent recruiting the general to provide secrets to
Russia. The Chinese intelligence services, hearing hints of the recruitment,
invite Egorova to advise them in their efforts to gain from Nash the identity
of their traitor. Adding a further layer of intrigue is that the Chinese are
using their equivalent of the Russian Sparrow. Such Chinese agents are known by
the highly descriptive title of a “poison-feather bird”.
Tension
builds but not with equal intensity in the respective nations as the Russians
and their mole do not know there is a mole within Russia hunting the American
mole.
The plotting
on both sides becomes more ruthless as the hunts close in.
Hollywood
will never replicate the ending in any movie. I found the conclusion moving,
not a common experience in a spy novel. Subtlety is appreciated in an American thriller.
****
Matthews, Jason - (2013) - Red Sparrow and Recipes and Menus in Spy Thrillers; (2015) - Palace of Treason and Vladimir Putin in Spy Fiction and Libel (Part I and Part II and Part III)
I prefer it, too, if thrillers don't have 'Hollywood' endings, Bill. I'm glad this one didn't. And this thriller does have an intriguing premise. I'm sorry to hear some of the secondary characters were a little formulaic for you, but it's good to hear this one had things to like, too.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. Matthews could be Le Carre but I think he had to establish himself with more conventional spy novels. There is some of the the bleakness of Le Carre in The Kremlin's Candidate.
Delete