During the war he chose not to issue
public protests about Nazi actions against Europe’s Jews. Author Mark Riebling
stated in the summer of 1942 the pope had written an article:
The pages contained the Vatican’s strongest protest yet
against the persecution of Jewry. The pope planned to publish it in L’Osservatore that very evening. But
Leiber urged His Holiness to remember the Dutch bishops’ pastoral letter. If it
had cost the lives of 40,000 Jews, an even stronger protest, from even more
prominent lips, could cost the lives of many times more. The pope would do
better to keep a public silence and do whatever he could in secret. Pius handed
the pages to Leiber, who thre them into the kitchen fireplace and watched them
burn.
With that decision the pope became one of the millions of Europeans who chose to be silent about the Holocaust.
Among those who remained quiet with
him were the leaders of the International Red Cross. Determined to maintain
neutrality during the war they were silent on the Holocaust.
Red Cross visits to concentration
camps were carefully managed by the Nazis and those conducting the examinations
did not stray from the Nazi arrangements. They published reports of sanitized
camps.
The Pope joined thousands across
Europe who sought to protect and save Jews in private. Riebling states:
Over the same period (German occupation of Rome), 477 Jews
had hidden in Vatican City, and 4,238
received sanctuary in Roman monasteries and convents.
We look with admiration on the brave
Berliners who kept 2,000 Jews known as “U-boats” alive through the war in the
Nazi capital.
The pope did choose to become a part
of the underground Resistance to the Nazis by working with the German military
Resistance plotting against Hitler.
It remains striking to me that the
Pope participated in conspiracies to kill Hitler. Should the leader of the
Catholic Church be a part of the assassination of a Head of Government?
It means the Church is taking an
active violent role in world politics.
Could Pope Pius XII have saved more
Jewish lives had he publicly protested the genocidal actions of the Nazis towards
the Jews of Europe?
I have come to doubt such actions
would have had an impact. It was an ideological decision to embark on the
Holocaust. The traditional methods of Anti-Semites in marginalizing Jewish
people and seeking to exile them were inadequate for the Nazis. They were
determined to render Europe Jew free.
They did not care if their
persecution and execution of Jews damaged Germany’s economy and scientific
research.
While eliminating Jews was the
highest priority of the Nazis there was a public protest that saved Jewish
lives. In 1942 the non-Jewish wives of Jewish men about to be deported to the
camps in the East took to the streets of Berlin. The Nazis backed down and did
not deport the husbands.
I believe it would have been
different had the pope protested. The Nazis wanted to eradicate the Christian
faith, especially the Catholic Church. I think public protests from Pius would
have accelerated their efforts to destroy the Church.
While Nazis were reluctant to
conduct reprisals against German women I do not think they would have hesitated
with regard to the Church.
Most important the Pope had been
unable to influence the Nazis in their actions in Poland against the Church. Three
thousand Polish clergy and three million Christian Poles were killed. When his efforts on behalf of Catholics were
ignored I cannot see the Nazis reacting more positively to protests by him with
regard to the Jews.
Popes, including Pius XII, had publicly
protested against the persecutions conducted by Communist Russia to no avail.
Did the pope have a moral obligation
to protest even if his words were futile is a different question? I am sure he
thought about the choices he made every day for the rest of his life.