What
I had not realized was the extent of his involvement in real life crime. He
participated in investigations to find those guilty of crime and to aid those
unjustly accused.
I
expect he was partially inspired by his own experience with the criminal
justice system. As a young doctor in 1885 he was visited by the police who,
after receiving an anonymous letter, were making inquiries into the death of a
boy for whom Doyle was caring in his home as a “resident patient”. Medicated
with choral hydrate he had suddenly died. Though proper, police suspicions were
raised by Doyle signing the death certificate. Doyle would have at least faced
a major investigation but for the visit of a local doctor the night of the
death who confirmed Doyle’s treatment.
It is
no surprise that he was constantly contacted by members of the public seeking
his assistance in solving mysteries. The chapter title concerning those letters
says it best – By Every Post a Call for Help. He responded to many letters. My
next post will provide an example of both his deductive skills and his
willingness to reply to letters.
Doyle
was willing to lend his support to causes through the grand English tradition
of writing a letter to The Times. In
1896 an American woman, the wife of a prominent San Francisco businessman, was
caught stealing from a series of shops and a hotel. She pled guilty with her
barrister advancing evidence of a nervous disposition “at certain periods” and was
sentenced to 3 months to jail. Doyle, after recounting her theft of items of
modest value she did not need, submitted:
It can surely not
be denied that there is at least a doubt as to her moral responsibility, and if
there is a doubt, than the benefit of it should be given to one whose sex and
position as a visitor amongst us give her a double claim upon our
consideration. It is to a consulting room and not a cell that she should be
sent.
After
considering the representations of Doyle and others she was released the next
day.
Doyle
was an active participant in the efforts to determine the identity of Jack the Ripper.
In his analysis of the Ripper’s letter Doyle thought the Ripper had at least
been to America as he used expressions from the United States. Doyle also believed the Ripper disguised himself in women’s clothes to escape from the
scenes of the murders.
On
his travels Doyle was consulted on local crimes. During a major trip to Africa a
couple of years before his death the South African police sought his insights
on a puzzling murder.
As
he grew older Doyle was committed to spiritualism and looked to the insights
psychics could provide in solving crimes.
After
Agatha Christie disappeared the police approached Doyle. He obtained one of Christie's gloves and took it to a “medium and psychometrist” who, without information on the owner of the glove,
identified it as from an Agatha who was not dead and would be found by the
following Wednesday. The medium’s statements proved to be true.
Doyle
sought to right injustice to the end of his life. Shortly before his death he supported the campaign to exonerate the executed American anarchists, Saaco and Vanzetti.
He believed they were executed because of their political convictions rather
than for committing murder.
Through
reading the book my admiration for Doyle grew. He was stalwart in seeking justice for over 40 years. Many complain about injustice but few take action to right wrongs. Doyle was committed to acting in support of principle.
Costello’s
approach of providing examples and analysis chronologically is my preferred
approach to non-fiction. His narrative is brisk. He is not writing an academic
work but his statements are well researched and his analysis solidly based.
Arthur & George by Julian Barnes is an interesting novel on one of Doyle's most famous interventions in criminal cases, that of George Edalji.
ReplyDeleteReading the facts of the Edalji case is to wonder at the prospect of justice in this world. Judges sometimes speak of accused being wilfully blind to their actions. In this case it was the authorities who were wilfully blind.
DeleteOh, this does sound very interesting, Bill. I've heard from a few other people I trust that it's very well-researched and solidly written. And it's fascinating to see the sort of person he was in real life. I think I'm going to need to add this to my list.
ReplyDeleteMargot: I hope you read it. I would be very interested in hearing your thoughts on Doyle's involvement in the disappearance of Agatha Christie.
Delete