Sam
I just finished reading Cut You Down and enjoyed the book.
I find Dave a fascinating character. The
mixture of erudition and brawn are intriguing.
I do find myself a little discouraged by
the number of violent confrontations experienced by Dave. In both Invisible Dead and Cut You Down Dave is badly beaten on more than one occasion.
While I admire his toughness it is
starting to challenge my credibility that he could endure such violence without
apparent permanent consequences.
I appreciate he has a persona that
reminded me of famous American crime fiction characters, Travis McGee and
Spenser, and in Canada Howard Shrier’s sleuth, Jonah Geller. All are big strong
men with above average intelligence.
What I remember of the McGee series is
that he might suffer injury once in a book but not on multiple occasions.
Spenser was hurt more often, including an
assassination attempt where he was shot by a rifle and endured a long recovery
lasting months. There were times later in the series when I thought the
physical punishment he endured was stretching belief.
I acknowledge Dave is a hard boiled
detective but he also has a wit and level of intelligence that would allow him
to advance investigations with his brains rather than his fists. Dave’s love of
literature reflects a thinking man
I understand his psyche leads him into
dangerous situations but I am hoping he will turn from regular righteous
violence to a more cerebral approach to investigations. He can keep the
violence in reserve for special situations.
It is uncommon in the world of crime
fiction to emphasize thinking. Violence with high body counts have become the
preferred method of solving crimes.
When I read Shrier’s books Buffalo Jump and High Chicago I was discouraged by the level of violence in each
book. I was glad to see in Miss Montreal
an increase in the thinking and a decrease in the violence.
Yet I ask might it be possible Dave will
adjust his approach to investigations?
I set out in my review that I thought you
were continuing to mature as a writer and each of your books is better than the
previous book.
If
you are able to reply, and are willing, I would include your reply in a post
with this letter.
Thanks.
Bill
Selnes
****
Hi, Bill
Thanks so much for the kind words! I
appreciate the comments and your knowledge and love of the genre. You raise
some good points. I'll try to answer as best I can.
Speaking generally, I want the violence
in the Wakeland novels to be visceral and uncomfortable. I don't want to
trivialize violence. What happens has consequences for both the perpetrator and
recipient.
Bear in mind Dave Wakeland is
considerably younger than most other PIs. He's 29 in Invisible Dead, 30 in Cut
You Down. In the Big Sleep, Phillip Marlowe is in his mid-thirties. Kinsey
Milhone is in her early thirties in A is for Alibi. Wakeland is still learning,
still making mistakes, and still slightly unformed in his investigative
approach. Also, he's still in the age range where the body is more resilient.
The violence in the Wakeland novels is much, much less than a boxer or MMA
fighter endures.
John D MacDonald and Robert B Parker
were both very formative authors for me.There are usually scenes in those books
where McGee or Spenser dispatch multiple assailants with ease, which to me
strains more credibility than enduring a few punches and slaps. I'd rather err
on showing the brutality than brushing it off or making the character
superhuman.
Your point about using brains rather
than fists to solve cases is well taken. I feel, from my research into
real-life investigative work, that while both have a role, it's actually
determination and persistence that solve cases. Dave might not be the smartest
or toughest guy on the block, but he's the one that won't quit. Sometimes
that's unhealthy, verging into obsession, and again, there will be consequences
to that.
To sum up, I think violence is an
intrinsic part of the detective novel, and I take great pains to make the
violence in the books realistic, and to show its consequences. If you think the
events of Invisible Dead and Cut You Down haven't fully registered on Dave
Wakeland and company...well, just wait for book three!
Thanks again for the review, and feel
free to publish this on the blog.
Best,
Sam Wiebe
****
Wiebe, Sam - (2015) - Last of the Independents and The Unhanged Arthur Award; (2016) - Invisible Dead and Sam Wiebe on His Sleuths; (2018) - Cut You Down
This is really interesting. Thank you, both. The question of how much violence is 'too much' is a fascinating one, and I think it depends in part on the character, as is clear here. But it also depends on the reader's individual perception. For me, the essential question is: does the violence (or anything else, really) serve the story?
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. I can almost accept Sam's presence that violence is inherent in detective crime fiction. My caveat is there are detectives such as Nero Wolfe for whom violence is not inherent to the story beyond the murder at the heart of the mystery.
DeleteAnd whether or not you were on the cruise, the Edgar Best Novel award was given to Attica Locke for Bluebird, Bluebird.
ReplyDeleteI am so glad to see that. That is such a well-written book.
Kathy D.: Thanks for the comment. It was not a surprise to me Bluebird, Bluebird was the winner. It would have taken an exceptional book to have won in place of it.
DeleteVery interesting exchange, with good points from both of you.
ReplyDeleteMoira: Thanks for the comment. Sam is as thoughtful in his email as he is in his books.
Delete