Canada
did close the gap but it took longer than most historians felt needed which
allowed tens of thousands of German soldiers to escape.
In
the battles to close the gap the tip of the Canadian army was the 4th
Canadian Armoured Division (4 Cdn Arm Div). Their leader, Major General George
Kitching, was relieved of his command as the battle ended. Caravaggio argues he
should not have been removed.
In 21 Days in Normandy there is a detailed
exploration of the structure and makeup of the Canadian army. That section is
slow going and could have been significantly reduced with much of the
information consigned to footnotes or appendices for those readers wanting such detail. (There were already detailed and extensive footnotes and appendices.)
It was
useful to have background information especially about the woeful state of the
Canadian army in 1939. Canada was ill-prepared for armoured warfare. When WW II commenced Canada had a mere “sixteen
outdated British Light Mk VI tanks and twelve Carden-Lloyd carriers”.
Unlike most books on
battles there is extensive discussion on how army bureaucracy can help or
hinder the troops fighting the battles.
The Canadian army of WW
II had an enormous number of reports and orders flowing up and down from
division HQ. With regard to the functioning of the division in Normandy:
Breakdowns in situational awareness, common
intent and battle procedure would plague the 4 CDN Armd Div in its first major
battle.
Kitching trained and
served in the British Army before coming to Canada in 1938. He joined the
Canadian Army in 1939 as a 2nd lieutenant. By February of 1944 he
was a Major General in commanding the 4th Canadian Armoured
Division. It was a series of promotions not uncommon in the rapidly expanding
Canadian army of WW II. It was not considered necessary that the commander of
an armoured division have experience in an armoured division. Kitching was an
infantry officer.
Simonds worked well with
Kitching in Sicily and Italy and wanted Kitchings to be with him in northern
Europe. Each highly respected the other.
It was a surprise that
the division had no actual division scale exercises prior to being deployed to
France.
They arrived in France well after the invasion on June 6.
They prepared for battle and moved into position in early August to lead the attack to close the gap.
(My next post will contain the rest of my review.)
This sounds like a thorough discussion, Bill. And it's good to hear that, besides the story of the actual battles, etc., there's also discussion of the forces at work behind them, and the bureaucracy that managed it all. I'll be looking forward to the rest of your review.
ReplyDeleteMargot: Thanks for the comment. It is an interesting book. I hope you will add some thoughts when I put up the rest of my review.
Delete